31 October 2011
Indecision on religious slaughter cowardly
The cruel slaughter of 250,000 animals every year will continue in Australia after Primary Industries Ministers shirked a decision that could have removed religious slaughter exemptions.
The RSPCA said the non-decision was completely unacceptable and would dismay the public who were shocked to discover that un-stunned slaughter was occurring in Australia in the first place.
“There is no excuse for delaying this decision. There have been at least two years of consultations and all parties have made their positions clear,” said RSPCA Australia Scientific Officer, Melina Tensen.
“The government knows this is a sensitive issue and their way of dealing with it is to ignore it and hope it goes away. If ministers are indeed insisting on further consultation then the RSPCA is calling for no further exemptions to be provided for religious slaughter while it is being contested.
“These ministers have at hand the overwhelming evidence that cutting the throats of conscious animals is cruel and causes significant pain and suffering. 99% of animals are already stunned in Australia - stunning is accepted by the Islamic community and the Jewish community accepts the stunning of cattle. There is no reason for un-stunned slaughter to continue.”
The RSPCA also slammed the Council’s failure to decide on how long dairy calves destined for slaughter can legally be off feed.
“For two and a half years, primary industries ministers have debated time off feed for dairy (bobby) calves and today’s indecision fails to put in place the most basic protection for these young, vulnerable animals.
“800,000 dairy calves are trucked to slaughter every year and it is inexcusable that we still don’t have a legally enforceable standard to help ensure their welfare.
“Ministers have today failed Australian animals in two critical areas and in doing so they have failed to meet the expectations of the Australian community who expect the decent treatment of animals born into our care.”
27 October 2011
Ministers to rethink un-stunned slaughter exemptions
Primary Industries Ministers will meet in Melbourne tomorrow to consider removing exemptions that currently allow the slaughter of fully conscious animals to meet a small demand for religious slaughter in Australia.
“Contrary to recent claims, stunning is mandatory in Australia. Australian law requires all animals to be stunned unconscious before slaughter and this is the case for 99% of animals killed in Australia every year,” said RSPCA Australia Scientific Officer Melina Tensen.
“That’s because our law recognises that cutting the throat of a conscious animal is cruel and results in a painful, distressing and prolonged death. All available scientific evidence backs this up.
“There are a small number of abattoirs however (in Victoria, South Australia and New South Wales) that have obtained exemptions to this law, allowing them to kill animals (mostly sheep) without stunning them. This satisfies a small demand for Kosher and some Halal meat.
“The slaughter of conscious animals is completely unnecessary in Australia. Stunning is widely accepted by Islamic authorities and Jewish authorities accept the stunning of cattle.
“There is no reason why 250,000 sheep every year should continue to suffer through the pain and distress of dying while fully conscious when 99% of their counterparts are shielded from this horror.
“Primary industries and agriculture ministers from around the country will meet tomorrow to consider removing these exemptions.
“Our information is that there is widespread support within most states to remove all religious slaughter exemptions however pressure from New South Wales and Victoria could force a decision to allow un-stunned slaughter to continue.
“The RSPCA is appealing to those two states to look at the science, consider the widespread acceptance of stunning by religious authorities and represent the views of Australians who now, after witnessing the reality of un-stunned slaughter, have overwhelmingly rejected it.”
24 October 2011
Victorian Government announces new puppy factory legislation
The Victorian Coalition Government has introduced tough new laws in a bid to crackdown on the puppy factory industry. New legislation introduced includes stricter penalties and large fines for cruelty and equips the RSPCA with new policing and confiscation powers. New laws also allow for seizing profits and assets of illegal puppy factories and the establishment of a $1.6 million Animal Welfare Fund designed to assist organisations that provide care and treatment for animals rescued from puppy factories. In addition, it will now also be illegal to sell or advertise the sale of puppies without a microchip identification number or notice.
The Coalition Government’s crackdown includes:
- an increase in maximum penalties for puppy factories operating illegally, from $1,195 to $20,000;
- penalties of up to $30,000 for rogue operators that breach a Code of Practice;
- a ban on owning animals, of up to 10 years, for those found guilty of operating unregistered puppy factories or breaching a code of conduct;
- the introduction of a new offence for breeding establishments that fail to provide a microchip number (or council domestic animal business registration number) in an advertisement for a dog or cat; and the potential seizure of profits, assets and property of illegal puppy factory operators.
The RSPCA commends the Government on introducing these laws which will go a long way in helping to protect dogs in puppy factories. The RSPCA would also like to thank everyone that has supported our Close Puppy Factories campaign to help influence this positive change.
More change is still needed to close puppy factories and the RSPCA will continue its campaign by focusing on the sales channels breeders use, and continuing to create awareness about this unscrupulous industry.
21 October 2011
Live Export review a missed opportunity
The RSPCA is profoundly disappointed that one of the cruellest aspects of live export – un-stunned slaughter – can continue.
The independent review into live export, conducted by Bill Farmer, has failed to address the necessity of stunning animals unconscious prior to slaughter.
“This review was an opportunity to properly protect animals at the point of slaughter but instead there is no recommendation on stunning and the government has made no commitment to require it,” RSPCA Australia CEO Heather Neil said.
“The fact that the number of Australian cattle that will be stunned in Indonesia is expected to grow from 8% to around 90% in just six months shows that it’s entirely possible to overcome any perceived barriers when the incentive is there and that markets can respond quickly if the supply of Australian animals depends on it.
“The Government needs to make it clear to the export industries that if they don’t announce targets for stunning, by country, and act themselves, they will make it a requirement.”
Ultimately it is incredibly disappointing that this review did not investigate options to phase out the trade.
“The cruelty exposed in Indonesia was the last straw for many Australians who have run out of patience – the public overwhelmingly does not support live export.
“With our meat exports worth six times more than live exports there is a strong economic case for reform and planning to move away from the live trade would better position producers for the future.”
The RSPCA however welcomed the very positive step towards full traceability of all exported animals through a controlled supply chain.
“This is something welfare groups have been pushing for a number of years because while ever private sale is allowed there is no way to set standards for the treatment of Australian livestock.
“While it’s unacceptable that it has again taken the industry being under threat to see proper protections put in place, we are pleased this is finally occurring.
“It is important to not to lose sight of the scale of the suffering that has led to this point. 6.4 million cattle have been exported to Indonesia over the past 18 years, 160 million animals to all markets since the live trade began.
“It is unforgivable that it is only through animal welfare groups being prepared to act as live export watchdogs has this industry been brought to account.”

|